Below are listed the 10 appeals decided in the London Borough of Brent area in the past 30 days.
To find more and older appeals for this authority area please use the search bar above. Members get full access to the underlying appeal decision documents.
To find out more about AppealFinder visit our Home page.
Alleged in the notice is without planning permission, the installation of new windows to the front of the premises.
Decision Date: 8th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Majid Dehdashti
Site Address: 42 Goldsmith Lane, LONDON, NW9 9AS,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice Upheld
Alleged in the notice is without planning permission, the material change of use of the pavement/front courtyard/former raised landscaped area outside of 1A Plaza Parade to a sales display/storage area used for retail purposes and, without planning permission, the installation of a new shop front with retractable canopies/awnings and orange/red metal bar to front boundary wall's inner side of tree/flower bed.
Decision Date: 8th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Shukra Fruit and Vegetable
Site Address: Unit 1A Plaza Parade, Ealing Road , WEMBLEY, HA0 4YA,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice varied and upheld
Alleged in the notice is without planning permission, the material change of use of the rear of the premises to a car wash, vehicle service and repair garage, and storage of vehicles and parts ("the unauthorised change of use").
Decision Date: 8th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: MR SAAD ABDUL
Site Address: Shisha Centre, 301 Cricklewood Broadway, LONDON, NW2 6PG,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice Upheld
Retention of existing front porch but with new proposed pitched roof instead of as built flat roof.
Decision Date: 8th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr J Chevaillier
Site Address: 1 Langdon Drive, LONDON, NW9 8NS,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice Upheld
Alleged in the notice is Without planning permission, the installation of metal containers at the premises.
Decision Date: 28th March 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Paul Evers
Site Address: Land at Station Terrace, (formerly known as Salvage Timber Yard), London, NW10 5RS,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice Upheld
A container storage facility accommodating 17no x 6m units to the rear for use by local small businesses.
Decision Date: 26th March 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr J Virdi
Site Address: 58-60 Ealing Road, Wembley, HA0 4TQ,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Planning (W)
Outcome: Allowed
Change of use from a single family dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) (Class C4).
Decision Date: 24th March 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Alshad Ladha
Site Address: 145 Bridgewater Road, WEMBLEY, HA0 1AH,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Planning (W)
Outcome: Dismissed
Alleged in the notice is Without planning permission, the material change of use of the premises to a waste transfer site, tyre fitting, and vehicle storage, parking and sales.
Decision Date: 14th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Prezemyslaw (Peter) Zalecki
Site Address: 31 Brentfield, LONDON, NW10 8LS,
Procedure: Hearing
Case Type: Enforcement Notice
Outcome: Notice varied and upheld
Development is described as ‘improved front garden landscaping and drainage’.
Decision Date: 11th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Vinod Chopra
Site Address: 35 Sudbury Court Road, HARROW, HA1 3SD,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Householder (HAS)
Outcome: Dismissed
The ‘retention of front garden boundary treatment’.
Decision Date: 11th April 2025
App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******
Applicant: Mr Vinod Chopra
Site Address: 35 Sudbury Court Road, HARROW, HA1 3SD,
Procedure: Written representations
Case Type: Householder (HAS)
Outcome: Dismissed