Below are listed the 5 appeals decided in the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council area in the past 30 days.
To find more and older appeals for this authority area please use the search bar above. Members get full access to the underlying appeal decision documents.
To find out more about AppealFinder visit our Home page.
Without listed building consent the construction of a first floor rear extension to the building and alterations to the existing single storey rear section of the property.
Decision Date: 7th January 2026App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******Applicant: ***********************Site Address: *****************, SAWREY PLACE, BRADFORD, BD5 0DA, Procedure: Written representationsCase Type: Enforcement Listed Building and Conservation AreaOutcome: Quashed on legal grounds
Are replacement front and rear doors (retrospective).
Decision Date: 24th December 2025App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******Applicant: ***********************Site Address: *****************, Esholt, SHIPLEY, BD17 7RD, Procedure: Written representationsCase Type: Planning Listed Building and Conservation Area (Y)Outcome: Dismissed
Construction of single storey workshop and office extension.
Decision Date: 19th January 2026App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******Applicant: ***********************Site Address: *****************, Turner Lane, Addingham, Bradford, LS29 0LJ, Procedure: Written representationsCase Type: Planning (W)Outcome: Dismissed
Replacement of timber windows in all apartments with upvc.
Decision Date: 19th January 2026App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******Applicant: ***********************Site Address: *****************, Queens Road, Ilkley, LS29 9TE, Procedure: Written representationsCase Type: Planning (W)Outcome: Allowed
Single-storey extension to front with canopy roof, increase dual pitched section of roof to same height as central gable and part two- part single-storey rear extension.
Decision Date: 16th January 2026App Ref: APP/****/*/**/*******Applicant: ***********************Site Address: *****************, KEIGHLEY, BD20 6JT, Procedure: Written representationsCase Type: Householder (HAS)Outcome: Dismissed