Ever been dismayed to see your planning application allocated to a development management officer with reputation for refusing development? The sad fact of life is that not all officers are the same. The question is, does the same apply to planning inspectors?
Of course every Inspector tries hard to be professional and fair. All Inspectors must abide by rules of impartiality. Nevertheless, Inspectors are human too and naturally each has their own personality, perspective and unique experience of life. Furthermore, the planning system is not a simple matter of applying tick-box assessments and clear rules; subjective judgements are required. Ultimately decision-making is down to the individual. Who the decision maker is does matter.
The Planning Inspectorate's annual statistics for each individual Planning Inspector are reproduced below so you can see the % appeals allowed by your appointed Inspector over 12 months. Please note this is only a reliable indicator where there are a significant number of appeals. The smaller the number of appeals, the less useful is the data. For example, if the number of appeals is less than 10 in any one category, the results will reflect the nature of the individual appeals more than the individual inspector. Casework is allocated on the best balance of availability, geography, casework level and expertise. This may produce apparent patterns of outcome that is in fact only an artefact of the way work is allocated. Please bear this in mind when interpreting the % of appeals approved.
It’s worth looking at previous appeal Decisions made by your nominated Inspector on developments similar to your own case, as it may highlight your Inspector’s thinking processes. For example, one Inspector may have a particular focus on design issues while another may emphasise landscape impact. It is particularly valuable to look at appeals they have dismissed, before you respond to the LPA’s Statement of Case.
Appeal Finder also has a table showing the % allowed by local planning authority, by type of appeal, available here.
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
J Allan | 0 | - | 74 | 47% | 0 | - |
K Allen | 84 | 23% | 12 | 50% | 0 | - |
M Allen | 9 | 56% | 1 | 0% | 24 | 38% |
M Andrews | 33 | 48% | 48 | 48% | 0 | - |
M Aqbal | 62 | 37% | 12 | 58% | 0 | - |
S Ashworth | 17 | 41% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
R Aston | 6 | 33% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Ayres | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Baird | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Bale | 3 | 33% | 1 | 0% | 16 | 31% |
D Barnes | 40 | 33% | 38 | 29% | 0 | - |
R Barrett | 3 | 100% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
R Bartlett | 71 | 45% | 8 | 50% | 0 | - |
H Baugh-Jones | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Baxter | 20 | 10% | 0 | - | 39 | 44% |
G Bayliss | 26 | 19% | 8 | 13% | 0 | - |
C Beeby | 12 | 42% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Bell-Williamson | 17 | 0% | 56 | 20% | 0 | - |
K Bennett | 0 | - | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
T Bennett* | 14 | 43% | 19 | 63% | 0 | - |
E Benson | 6 | 17% | 49 | 39% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
A Berry | 82 | 27% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
P Biggers | 12 | 25% | 13 | 15% | 0 | - |
C Billings | 42 | 21% | 13 | 31% | 0 | - |
J Blackwell | 15 | 33% | 1 | 0% | 34 | 18% |
D Board | 12 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Boffin | 3 | 67% | 0 | - | 13 | 38% |
V Bond | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 15 | 27% |
M Boniface | 8 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Bore | 20 | 30% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Boughton | 8 | 50% | 55 | 53% | 0 | - |
N Bowden | 47 | 28% | 15 | 47% | 0 | - |
J Bowyer | 41 | 29% | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
J Braithwaite | 14 | 71% | 0 | - | 24 | 38% |
J Bridgwater | 5 | 60% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
T Bristow | 17 | 47% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
N Bromley | 47 | 21% | 12 | 42% | 0 | - |
S Brook | 50 | 32% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
M Brooker | 15 | 60% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
S Brown | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Brownless | 12 | 8% | 0 | - | 14 | 14% |
R Buchanan | 68 | 16% | 15 | 20% | 0 | - |
T Burnham | 48 | 25% | 25 | 44% | 0 | - |
R Bust | 5 | 60% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Butcher | 71 | 21% | 7 | 57% | 0 | - |
H Butcher | 6 | 33% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
M Caine | 22 | 14% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
A Caines | 35 | 37% | 40 | 33% | 0 | - |
V Callister | 12 | 50% | 73 | 40% | 0 | - |
C Carpenter | 81 | 28% | 15 | 27% | 0 | - |
S Castle | 66 | 27% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
E Catcheside | 52 | 25% | 9 | 56% | 0 | - |
R Catchpole | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
M Chalk | 11 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Chamberlain | 22 | 36% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Cheesley | 0 | - | 9 | 11% | 0 | - |
K Child | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
I Chukwujekwu* | 0 | - | 16 | 31% | 0 | - |
J Clark | 47 | 30% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
L Clark | 36 | 14% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
B Clarke | 43 | 19% | 11 | 18% | 0 | - |
D Cleary | 4 | 50% | 49 | 47% | 0 | - |
R Clegg | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Clowes | 51 | 14% | 20 | 25% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
L Coffey | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Colebourne | 0 | - | 35 | 34% | 0 | - |
L Conde | 75 | 33% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
A Coombes* | 0 | - | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
P Cooper | 33 | 30% | 22 | 23% | 0 | - |
W Cooper | 6 | 33% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
C Couper | 21 | 43% | 65 | 34% | 0 | - |
T Courtney* | 10 | 0% | 26 | 27% | 0 | - |
R Cowley | 61 | 13% | 24 | 38% | 0 | - |
C Coyne | 10 | 40% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Cramond | 23 | 30% | 50 | 30% | 0 | - |
C Cresswell | 22 | 50% | 5 | 80% | 0 | - |
L Crosby | 14 | 57% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Cross | 55 | 25% | 15 | 13% | 0 | - |
M Cryan | 53 | 13% | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
F Cullen | 4 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 16 | 6% |
R Curnow | 5 | 60% | 0 | - | 27 | 22% |
L Cuthbert | 48 | 35% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
E Dade | 59 | 37% | 21 | 67% | 0 | - |
A Dale | 1 | 0% | 42 | 50% | 0 | - |
E Davies* | 0 | - | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Davies | 19 | 21% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
H Davies | 25 | 32% | 0 | - | 34 | 44% |
N Davies | 40 | 48% | 6 | 50% | 0 | - |
J Davis | 2 | 0% | 48 | 38% | 0 | - |
A Dawe | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Dean | 13 | 38% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
G Deane | 14 | 21% | 64 | 28% | 0 | - |
R Dickson* | 10 | 20% | 20 | 30% | 0 | - |
P Dignan | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 23 | 26% |
C Dillon | 18 | 28% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
L Douglas | 13 | 23% | 1 | 0% | 41 | 15% |
K Down | 0 | - | 50 | 62% | 0 | - |
C Downes | 5 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Downs | 107 | 15% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
J Dowsett | 20 | 15% | 9 | 100% | 0 | - |
G Dring | 64 | 17% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
G Dudley | 0 | - | 0 | - | 26 | 27% |
N Duff | 19 | 42% | 10 | 50% | 0 | - |
I Dyer | 27 | 41% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Dyer | 3 | 67% | 0 | - | 15 | 20% |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
R E Jones | 25 | 48% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
A Edginton | 23 | 13% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Edwards | 53 | 28% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
S Edwards | 17 | 18% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Eggleton | 8 | 13% | 61 | 33% | 0 | - |
D Ellis* | 7 | 14% | 20 | 15% | 0 | - |
G Ellis | 1 | 100% | 72 | 43% | 0 | - |
H Ellison | 49 | 22% | 16 | 19% | 0 | - |
D English | 57 | 25% | 10 | 30% | 0 | - |
James Evans | 0 | - | 22 | 32% | 0 | - |
Julia Evans | 33 | 9% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
L Evans | 41 | 41% | 38 | 39% | 0 | - |
M Evans | 0 | - | 24 | 46% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
A Fagan | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 16 | 13% |
R Fallon | 29 | 17% | 10 | 60% | 0 | - |
J Felgate | 30 | 43% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
W Fieldhouse | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Fish | 22 | 23% | 6 | 67% | 0 | - |
D Fleming | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 23 | 26% |
L Fleming | 16 | 13% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Ford | 35 | 11% | 11 | 18% | 0 | - |
C Forrett | 2 | 0% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
G Fort | 9 | 22% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
L Francis | 32 | 19% | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
M Francis | 59 | 20% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
Z Franks | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 33 | 15% |
P Freer | 7 | 14% | 1 | 100% | 26 | 15% |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
R Gee | 73 | 37% | 10 | 50% | 0 | - |
T Gethin | 39 | 56% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
L Gibbons | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Gilbert | 6 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
T Gilbert-Wooldridge | 20 | 45% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Glaister* | 1 | 0% | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
S Glassar | 67 | 24% | 19 | 32% | 0 | - |
A Graham | 9 | 11% | 34 | 18% | 0 | - |
J Graham | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 14 | 0% |
E Gray | 6 | 50% | 0 | - | 30 | 10% |
L Greenwood | 16 | 38% | 47 | 57% | 0 | - |
E Grierson | 13 | 15% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
E Griffin | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 51 | 14% |
P Griffiths | 12 | 67% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Griffiths | 2 | 0% | 28 | 25% | 0 | - |
H Guest | 51 | 25% | 20 | 35% | 0 | - |
J Gunn | 35 | 20% | 11 | 45% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
C Hall | 31 | 32% | 53 | 45% | 0 | - |
R Hall | 35 | 23% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Hand | 9 | 67% | 0 | - | 23 | 39% |
P Hanna | 9 | 56% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Hanson | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 44 | 18% |
M Harbottle | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 21 | 43% |
C Harding | 51 | 25% | 16 | 25% | 0 | - |
S Harley | 26 | 12% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Harrington | 71 | 17% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
F Harrison | 63 | 27% | 21 | 29% | 0 | - |
D Hartley | 13 | 23% | 8 | 0% | 51 | 12% |
S Hartley | 25 | 40% | 39 | 41% | 0 | - |
A Harwood | 5 | 40% | 0 | - | 30 | 20% |
T Hatfield | 3 | 100% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Hawkins | 10 | 30% | 0 | - | 60 | 28% |
M Hayden | 4 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
D Hendley | 8 | 50% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
H Heward | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Heywood | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
A Hickey | 56 | 25% | 17 | 29% | 0 | - |
H Higenbottam | 0 | - | 0 | - | 5 | 0% |
Z Hill | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Hills | 84 | 33% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
R Hitchcock | 23 | 30% | 0 | - | 22 | 36% |
J Hobbs | 82 | 27% | 7 | 29% | 0 | - |
H Hockenhull | 12 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Hocking | 7 | 29% | 0 | - | 32 | 28% |
J Hockley | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Holden | 31 | 26% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
S Housden | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Howell | 23 | 26% | 1 | 0% | 32 | 22% |
Lora Hughes | 76 | 26% | 14 | 29% | 0 | - |
Lucy Hughes | 42 | 29% | 10 | 50% | 0 | - |
A Humphries* | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Hunt | 11 | 45% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Adrian Hunter | 5 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Alan Hunter | 63 | 35% | 8 | 50% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
S Indermaur | 0 | - | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
C Jack | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Jackson | 17 | 47% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Jackson | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A James | 67 | 22% | 17 | 47% | 0 | - |
P Jarratt | 4 | 0% | 0 | - | 18 | 22% |
P Jarvis | 6 | 0% | 35 | 54% | 0 | - |
W Johnson | 17 | 65% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
J Jolly | 31 | 23% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
D Jones | 17 | 24% | 3 | 67% | 34 | 9% |
E Jones | 0 | - | 0 | - | 7 | 0% |
G Jones | 7 | 29% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
H Jones | 54 | 28% | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
K Jones | 22 | 18% | 16 | 19% | 0 | - |
M Jones | 19 | 47% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
R Jones | 5 | 40% | 54 | 43% | 0 | - |
R S Jones | 8 | 25% | 0 | - | 30 | 30% |
A Jordan | 12 | 8% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
G Kean | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | 3 | 33% |
T Kemmann-Lane | 26 | 35% | 66 | 48% | 0 | - |
N Kempton | 7 | 43% | 11 | 18% | 0 | - |
A Khan* | 0 | - | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
T King | 21 | 48% | 0 | - | 35 | 34% |
R Kirby | 6 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Kok Lo | 38 | 16% | 4 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Lancaster | 72 | 26% | 17 | 24% | 0 | - |
K Langford-Tejrar | 7 | 43% | 17 | 82% | 0 | - |
T Law | 83 | 35% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
E Lawrence | 15 | 20% | 32 | 44% | 0 | - |
R Lawrence | 26 | 35% | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
S Lee | 9 | 11% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Leigh | 3 | 33% | 32 | 59% | 0 | - |
S Leonard | 26 | 15% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Lewis | 20 | 0% | 0 | - | 14 | 50% |
P Lewis | 4 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Livingstone | 29 | 34% | 11 | 36% | 0 | - |
H Lock | 9 | 11% | 35 | 26% | 0 | - |
M Long* | 0 | - | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Longmuir | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
M Madge | 10 | 50% | 0 | - | 24 | 50% |
A Mageean | 6 | 17% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
F Mahoney | 4 | 50% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
P Major | 4 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Major | 51 | 37% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
S Manchester | 26 | 12% | 7 | 0% | 0 | - |
N Manley* | 0 | - | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Manning | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
K Mansell | 0 | - | 9 | 22% | 0 | - |
O Marigold | 94 | 27% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Martinson | 36 | 14% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Masters | 6 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Maund | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R McAndrew | 2 | 0% | 28 | 32% | 0 | - |
A McCormack | 6 | 0% | 4 | 0% | 0 | - |
D McCreery | 25 | 32% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C McDonagh | 20 | 25% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
K McDonald | 21 | 19% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A McGlone | 13 | 46% | 6 | 33% | 30 | 7% |
N McGurk | 32 | 0% | 50 | 20% | 0 | - |
I McHugh | 0 | - | 47 | 38% | 0 | - |
L McKay | 4 | 0% | 11 | 18% | 0 | - |
C Megginson | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
R Merrett | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 18 | 39% |
M Middleton | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Mileham | 9 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
H Miles | 39 | 23% | 9 | 22% | 0 | - |
D Moore | 10 | 30% | 1 | 0% | 11 | 18% |
J Moore | 53 | 17% | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
F Morgan | 22 | 27% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
J Morrison | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Moss | 7 | 14% | 0 | - | 33 | 33% |
E Moulton | 80 | 35% | 15 | 53% | 0 | - |
C Mulloy | 13 | 23% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Murray | 42 | 26% | 10 | 60% | 0 | - |
J Murray | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 5 | 20% |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
R Naylor | 73 | 23% | 32 | 56% | 0 | - |
H Nicholls | 45 | 29% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
D Nicholson | 7 | 29% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Nilsson | 53 | 21% | 25 | 32% | 0 | - |
R Norman | 10 | 80% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Normington | 17 | 59% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A C Novitzky | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Nunn | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
L Nurser | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
L O'Brien | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
H O'Connor | 50 | 18% | 16 | 13% | 0 | - |
A O'Doherty | 58 | 31% | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
M Ollerenshaw | 36 | 19% | 23 | 30% | 0 | - |
E Ord | 0 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0% |
H Orr | 14 | 21% | 0 | - | 19 | 16% |
A Owen | 26 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
L Page | 9 | 22% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
G Pannell | 26 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Parker | 14 | 86% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
Robert Parker | 16 | 38% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
Rosamund Parker | 0 | - | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
A Parkin | 26 | 8% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
J Parsons | 17 | 24% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Partington | 19 | 74% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
J Pattison | 76 | 34% | 17 | 53% | 0 | - |
J Pearce | 39 | 23% | 17 | 47% | 0 | - |
S Pearce | 63 | 14% | 9 | 22% | 0 | - |
K Peerless | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 7 | 71% |
L Perkins | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 24 | 29% |
R Perrins | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 1 | 100% |
A Phillips | 6 | 33% | 0 | - | 31 | 23% |
B Phillips | 63 | 25% | 24 | 38% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
M Philpott | 15 | 13% | 6 | 67% | 0 | - |
E Pickernell | 30 | 33% | 15 | 20% | 0 | - |
A Pinto | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Pipe | 14 | 21% | 55 | 42% | 0 | - |
R Pipkin | 26 | 8% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
E Pleasant | 7 | 29% | 1 | 0% | 23 | 39% |
B Plenty | 61 | 44% | 17 | 41% | 0 | - |
S Poole | 8 | 25% | 34 | 6% | 0 | - |
N Pope | 14 | 36% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
H Porter | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Powys Jones | 16 | 44% | 56 | 61% | 0 | - |
N Praine | 48 | 17% | 9 | 33% | 0 | - |
D Prentis | 15 | 47% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Preston | 4 | 50% | 10 | 30% | 12 | 8% |
A Price | 76 | 24% | 9 | 56% | 0 | - |
J Price | 8 | 50% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
I Radcliffe | 22 | 45% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Rafferty | 61 | 20% | 17 | 12% | 0 | - |
F Rafiq | 63 | 37% | 8 | 38% | 0 | - |
E Randle | 6 | 50% | 68 | 37% | 0 | - |
S Rawle | 73 | 23% | 10 | 20% | 0 | - |
Z Raygen | 31 | 45% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
R Redford | 62 | 24% | 16 | 44% | 0 | - |
D Reed | 34 | 35% | 8 | 25% | 0 | - |
K Reeves | 29 | 10% | 19 | 26% | 0 | - |
J Reid | 33 | 18% | 9 | 0% | 0 | - |
L Reid | 24 | 17% | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
L Renaudon | 8 | 38% | 1 | 0% | 44 | 27% |
M Rivett | 0 | - | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
G Robbie | 6 | 33% | 4 | 50% | 32 | 19% |
K Robbie | 60 | 32% | 21 | 52% | 0 | - |
G Roberts | 19 | 37% | 58 | 64% | 0 | - |
M Robins | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
N Robinson | 50 | 26% | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
B Rogers | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 14 | 57% |
J Rogers | 63 | 22% | 14 | 7% | 0 | - |
G Rollings | 7 | 14% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Rose | 89 | 28% | 5 | 80% | 0 | - |
D Rose | 7 | 43% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Rose | 5 | 40% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Russell | 7 | 29% | 0 | - | 6 | 33% |
M Russell | 53 | 25% | 21 | 38% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
R Sabu | 27 | 41% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Sargent | 37 | 41% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Satheesan | 7 | 14% | 0 | - | 50 | 18% |
K Savage | 53 | 30% | 21 | 43% | 0 | - |
M Savage | 9 | 22% | 0 | - | 48 | 23% |
K Saward | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 7 | 14% |
A Scott | 23 | 26% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
C Searson | 11 | 55% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Seaton | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Seddon | 8 | 0% | 18 | 33% | 0 | - |
P Sedgwick | 1 | 0% | 54 | 37% | 0 | - |
H Senior | 39 | 13% | 8 | 25% | 0 | - |
C Shearing | 71 | 18% | 16 | 31% | 0 | - |
T Shields | 5 | 20% | 0 | - | 13 | 23% |
M Shrigley | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Shrimplin | 8 | 38% | 33 | 48% | 0 | - |
G Sibley | 15 | 53% | 15 | 47% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
L Simpson | 37 | 35% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
V Simpson | 54 | 43% | 13 | 46% | 0 | - |
A Smith | 37 | 51% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
D Smith | 33 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
H Smith | 67 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Jack Smith | 29 | 21% | 12 | 33% | 0 | - |
Jane Smith | 66 | 21% | 10 | 30% | 0 | - |
J Somers | 10 | 20% | 38 | 29% | 0 | - |
A Spataru* | 7 | 14% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
D Spencer | 7 | 43% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Spencer-Peet | 30 | 27% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Staddon | 0 | - | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
A Steen | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 3 | 67% |
K Stephens | 69 | 16% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
P Storey | 69 | 38% | 10 | 50% | 0 | - |
P Sturgess | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Sutton | 53 | 25% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
G Sylvester | 64 | 23% | 17 | 35% | 0 | - |
J Symmons | 27 | 22% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
G Symons | 0 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0% |
D Szymanski | 40 | 8% | 9 | 56% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
K Taylor | 7 | 43% | 0 | - | 11 | 0% |
N Teasdale | 73 | 34% | 28 | 50% | 0 | - |
A Terceiro | 46 | 33% | 8 | 38% | 0 | - |
B Thandi | 73 | 36% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Thomas | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Thomas | 15 | 33% | 23 | 30% | 0 | - |
N Thomas | 5 | 0% | 0 | - | 22 | 14% |
F Thompson | 3 | 33% | 1 | 0% | 25 | 16% |
P Thompson | 33 | 48% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Tivey | 2 | 0% | 43 | 28% | 0 | - |
K Townend | 59 | 25% | 11 | 9% | 0 | - |
D Troy | 10 | 50% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
A Tucker | 49 | 35% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
J Tweddle | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 14 | 36% |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
G Underwood | 12 | 8% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
N Unwin* | 3 | 67% | 28 | 43% | 3 | 0% |
A Veevers | 52 | 21% | 15 | 27% | 0 | - |
Alexander Walker | 10 | 0% | 0 | - | 36 | 19% |
Andrew Walker | 4 | 0% | 0 | - | 27 | 19% |
R Walker | 26 | 15% | 8 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Wallis | 8 | 13% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
K Ward | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Warder | 5 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Ware | 7 | 43% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Watson | 78 | 44% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Watson | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 14 | 57% |
B Webb | 33 | 27% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Webb* | 1 | 0% | 16 | 44% | 0 | - |
J Westbrook | 28 | 21% | 30 | 40% | 0 | - |
J Whalley | 8 | 50% | 32 | 44% | 0 | - |
A Wharton | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 20 | 40% |
P Whelan | 12 | 58% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P White | 6 | 17% | 5 | 0% | 23 | 4% |
J Wilde | 10 | 60% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
B Wilders | 9 | 44% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Wildgoose | 3 | 100% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ | s78 appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
Appeal Planning Officer* | no. decided 2023/24 | 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 | no. decided 2023/24 | % allowed 2023/24 |
D Wildsmith | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
F Wilkinson | 87 | 24% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
H Wilkinson | 53 | 32% | 13 | 54% | 0 | - |
S Wilkinson | 14 | 36% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
K Williams | 55 | 25% | 20 | 30% | 0 | - |
S Willis | 14 | 7% | 0 | - | 15 | 27% |
P Willmer | 0 | - | 56 | 38% | 0 | - |
P Willows | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 14 | 0% |
D Wilson | 65 | 23% | 10 | 10% | 0 | - |
L Wilson | 67 | 25% | 15 | 20% | 0 | - |
S Wilson* | 1 | 0% | 25 | 20% | 1 | 0% |
K Winnard | 0 | - | 34 | 29% | 0 | - |
S Wood | 12 | 17% | 23 | 26% | 0 | - |
M Woodward | 9 | 22% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
O Woodwards | 23 | 39% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
J Woolcock | 5 | 60% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Worden | 3 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Worley | 81 | 40% | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
E Worthington | 18 | 11% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Wraight | 17 | 29% | 17 | 35% | 15 | 13% |
A Wright | 70 | 20% | 20 | 30% | 0 | - |
Y Wright | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Wyatt | 6 | 33% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Wyborn | 45 | 29% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
Source: PINS annual statistics for the year, table 5.2
* Appeal Planning Officers inform a more senior Inspector's decision. It is the Inspector who is identified as the decision maker in Appeal Finder's pull-down list of Inspectors. This results in different totals compared to PINS table below. In addition, the total number of appeals decided is different to the number of documents on Appeal Finder as some appeals have multiple documents (eg. costs decisions) and others have shared documents (eg. linked appeals). To find appeals by a specific Appeal Planning Officer, type their name into Appeal Finder's search bar instead of using the pull-down list of Inspectors.
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* |
s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
J Allan | 0 | - | 74 | 51% | 0 | - |
K Allen | 1 | 0% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
M Allen | 36 | 19% | 7 | 14% | 0 | - |
R Allen | 5 | 20% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Andrews | 31 | 48% | 51 | 45% | 0 | - |
M Aqbal | 71 | 38% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
S Ashworth | 11 | 36% | 11 | 27% | 0 | - |
R Aston | 6 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
J Ayres | 12 | 58% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
S Baird | 7 | 71% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
M Bale | 12 | 42% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
D Barnes | 20 | 25% | 52 | 33% | 0 | - |
R Barrett | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Bartlett | 16 | 56% | 26 | 42% | 0 | - |
H Baugh-Jones | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Baxter | 39 | 31% | 24 | 42% | 0 | - |
G Bayliss | 58 | 24% | 8 | 50% | 0 | - |
C Beeby | 12 | 33% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
J Bell-Williamson | 30 | 27% | 39 | 23% | 0 | - |
K Bennett | 0 | - | 20 | 25% | 0 | - |
T Bennett* | 4 | 50% | 33 | 42% | 0 | - |
A Berry | 72 | 19% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
P Biggers | 18 | 44% | 21 | 33% | 0 | - |
J Blackwell | 88 | 27% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Board | 4 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Boffin | 2 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 19 | 47% |
V Bond | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 20 | 30% |
M Boniface | 19 | 32% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
J Bore | 3 | 67% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Boughton | 9 | 11% | 49 | 61% | 0 | - |
J Bowyer | 75 | 31% | 15 | 40% | 0 | - |
J Braithwaite | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 31 | 23% |
J Bridgwater | 0 | - | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
T Bristow | 17 | 29% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
S Brook | 33 | 21% | 9 | 33% | 0 | - |
M Brooker | 25 | 28% | 20 | 10% | 0 | - |
E Brownless | 21 | 24% | 2 | 50% | 7 | 29% |
R Buchanan | 58 | 21% | 16 | 19% | 0 | - |
T Burnham | 59 | 37% | 38 | 42% | 0 | - |
R Bust | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
C Butcher | 11 | 45% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
H Butcher | 7 | 43% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
M Caine | 54 | 28% | 7 | 0% | 0 | - |
A Caines | 31 | 29% | 45 | 22% | 0 | - |
V Callister | 14 | 29% | 56 | 41% | 0 | - |
C Carpenter | 4 | 75% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Castle | 30 | 17% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
R Catchpole | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Chalk | 76 | 26% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Chamberlain | 29 | 52% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Cheesley | 0 | - | 9 | 0% | 0 | - |
I Chukwujekwu* | 2 | 50% | 14 | 21% | 0 | - |
J Clark | 21 | 10% | 31 | 26% | 0 | - |
P Clark | 3 | 67% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
B Clarke | 61 | 30% | 16 | 6% | 0 | - |
R Clegg | 7 | 43% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Cliff | 10 | 20% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Clowes | 62 | 11% | 12 | 25% | 0 | - |
L Coffey | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Colebourne | 0 | - | 48 | 48% | 0 | - |
L Conde | 83 | 40% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
A Coombes* | 0 | - | 11 | 18% | 0 | - |
P Cooper | 52 | 15% | 13 | 46% | 0 | - |
W Cooper | 23 | 43% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Couper | 10 | 40% | 67 | 54% | 0 | - |
T Courtney* | 6 | 0% | 38 | 26% | 0 | - |
R Cowley | 50 | 16% | 17 | 29% | 0 | - |
C Coyne | 22 | 32% | 10 | 20% | 0 | - |
D Cragg | 18 | 17% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
D Cramond | 29 | 28% | 43 | 30% | 0 | - |
C Cresswell | 9 | 44% | 4 | 75% | 0 | - |
R Cridland | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
L Crosby | 7 | 71% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Cross | 77 | 13% | 26 | 15% | 0 | - |
S Crossen | 24 | 42% | 4 | 75% | 0 | - |
M Cryan | 59 | 37% | 26 | 15% | 0 | - |
F Cullen | 15 | 27% | 5 | 40% | 9 | 0% |
R Curnow | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 26 | 27% |
L Cuthbert | 53 | 30% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
E Dade | 40 | 40% | 11 | 55% | 0 | - |
A Dale | 0 | - | 46 | 57% | 0 | - |
G Davies | 26 | 35% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Davies* | 3 | 33% | 17 | 47% | 0 | - |
H Davies | 89 | 31% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
Nicholas Davies | 44 | 27% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
Nicola Davies | 41 | 37% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Davis | 2 | 0% | 51 | 49% | 0 | - |
A Dawe | 6 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Dean | 30 | 40% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
G Deane | 6 | 0% | 63 | 29% | 0 | - |
R Dickson* | 0 | - | 30 | 30% | 0 | - |
P Dignan | 4 | 50% | 0 | - | 11 | 73% |
C Dillon | 20 | 25% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
L Douglas | 45 | 31% | 18 | 56% | 13 | 23% |
J Dowling | 6 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Down | 0 | - | 34 | 50% | 0 | - |
C Downes | 9 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Downs | 59 | 25% | 20 | 55% | 0 | - |
J Dowsett | 19 | 53% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
G Dring | 15 | 33% | 10 | 30% | 0 | - |
G Dudley | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 9 | 11% |
N Duff | 0 | - | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
I Dyer | 19 | 16% | 10 | 10% | 0 | - |
S Dyer | 10 | 30% | 0 | - | 25 | 8% |
Inspector/ Decision Maker | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
A Edgington | 17 | 18% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Edwards | 78 | 41% | 7 | 0% | 0 | - |
S Edwards | 59 | 24% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
P Eggleton | 4 | 0% | 20 | 20% | 0 | - |
D Ellis* | 7 | 57% | 38 | 34% | 0 | - |
G Ellis | 9 | 33% | 54 | 30% | 0 | - |
H Ellison | 70 | 24% | 6 | 50% | 0 | - |
D English | 20 | 35% | 19 | 26% | 0 | - |
James Evans | 0 | - | 11 | 64% | 0 | - |
Julia Evans | 25 | 8% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
L Evans | 29 | 45% | 47 | 47% | 0 | - |
M Evans | 0 | - | 17 | 41% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
A Fagan | 3 | 100% | 0 | - | 6 | 50% |
R Fallon | 26 | 31% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
J Felgate | 9 | 78% | 9 | 56% | 0 | - |
A Fish | 37 | 38% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
D Fitzsimon | 0 | - | 21 | 38% | 0 | - |
D Fleming | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 21 | 38% |
L Fleming | 18 | 17% | 6 | 17% | 0 | - |
K Ford | 16 | 13% | 22 | 5% | 0 | - |
C Forrett | 4 | 0% | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
G Fort | 6 | 67% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
M Francis | 29 | 17% | 25 | 16% | 0 | - |
Z Franks | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 34 | 26% |
P Freer | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 29 | 14% |
Inspector/ Decision Maker | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
R Gee | 0 | - | 4 | 75% | 0 | - |
T Gethin | 9 | 44% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Gilbert | 19 | 32% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
T Gilbert-Wooldridge | 21 | 52% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Glaister* | 0 | - | 28 | 39% | 0 | - |
S Glassar | 73 | 12% | 23 | 26% | 0 | - |
G Gould | 7 | 29% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Graham | 9 | 33% | 37 | 22% | 0 | - |
J Graham | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 9 | 22% |
E Gray | 14 | 21% | 0 | - | 48 | 6% |
L Greenwood | 14 | 36% | 31 | 45% | 0 | - |
E Grierson* | 65 | 25% | 10 | 20% | 0 | - |
E Griffin | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 42 | 17% |
P Griffiths | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
S Griffiths | 6 | 33% | 22 | 55% | 0 | - |
H Guest | 41 | 24% | 13 | 54% | 0 | - |
J Gunn | 50 | 26% | 7 | 71% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
C Hall | 8 | 25% | 71 | 38% | 0 | - |
R Hall | 48 | 35% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
S Hand | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 38 | 26% |
P Hanna | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Hanson | 2 | 0% | 2 | 50% | 42 | 17% |
M Harbottle | 0 | - | 0 | - | 24 | 29% |
C Harding | 54 | 15% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
S Harley | 18 | 33% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
S Harrington | 51 | 45% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
F Harrison | 46 | 17% | 19 | 26% | 0 | - |
N Harrison | 4 | 75% | 7 | 86% | 0 | - |
D Hartley | 16 | 50% | 20 | 15% | 16 | 13% |
S Hartley | 16 | 31% | 42 | 55% | 0 | - |
A Harwood | 0 | - | 0 | - | 23 | 43% |
T Hatfield | 19 | 32% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
S Hawkins | 5 | 0% | 0 | - | 57 | 30% |
M Hayden | 0 | - | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Hendley | 20 | 45% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
H Heward | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Heywood | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Hickey | 47 | 19% | 12 | 17% | 0 | - |
H Higenbottam | 0 | - | 0 | - | 8 | 50% |
J Hills | 17 | 18% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
R Hitchcock | 84 | 38% | 7 | 14% | 0 | - |
J Hobbs | 13 | 15% | 9 | 44% | 0 | - |
H Hockenhull | 14 | 64% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
P Hocking | 0 | - | 0 | - | 27 | 7% |
J Hockley | 3 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
S Holden | 10 | 40% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Housden | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Howell | 74 | 35% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
L Hughes | 28 | 25% | 16 | 38% | 0 | - |
C Humphrey | 0 | - | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
A Humphries* | 0 | - | 21 | 43% | 0 | - |
S Hunt | 8 | 50% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
Adrian Hunter | 12 | 25% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
Alan Hunter | 8 | 38% | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
S Indermaur | 0 | - | 33 | 21% | 0 | - |
C Jack | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Jackson | 11 | 64% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Jackson | 13 | 54% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
A James | 3 | 67% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
P Jarratt | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 17 | 18% |
P Jarvis | 4 | 25% | 24 | 33% | 0 | - |
I Jenkins | 2 | 50% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
W Johnson | 17 | 47% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
J Jolly | 25 | 32% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Jones | 76 | 28% | 3 | 100% | 0 | - |
E Jones | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 3 | 33% |
Gareth Jones | 5 | 40% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Powys Jones | 6 | 33% | 56 | 63% | 0 | - |
H Jones | 55 | 20% | 17 | 41% | 0 | - |
M Jones | 55 | 27% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
Rachel Jones | 13 | 62% | 41 | 39% | 0 | - |
Richard E Jones | 65 | 34% | 8 | 0% | 0 | - |
Richard S Jones | 0 | - | 0 | - | 21 | 33% |
A Jordan | 10 | 20% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
G Kean | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 7 | 57% |
T Kemmann-Lane | 54 | 41% | 17 | 35% | 0 | - |
T King | 9 | 56% | 0 | - | 23 | 57% |
R Kirby | 7 | 14% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
K Lancaster | 6 | 17% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Langford-Tejrar | 4 | 0% | 32 | 38% | 0 | - |
T Law | 79 | 27% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
E Lawrence | 9 | 33% | 33 | 33% | 0 | - |
C Leigh | 3 | 67% | 24 | 42% | 0 | - |
S Leonard | 47 | 15% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
D Lewis | 10 | 70% | 0 | - | 62 | 85% |
P Lewis | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Lo | 10 | 10% | 8 | 38% | 0 | - |
H Lock | 2 | 50% | 51 | 27% | 0 | - |
M Long* | 0 | - | 27 | 33% | 0 | - |
J Longmuir | 12 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
R MacLeod | 29 | 34% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Madge | 3 | 67% | 0 | - | 33 | 27% |
A Mageean | 4 | 50% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
F Mahoney | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Major | 11 | 36% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Manchester | 38 | 18% | 29 | 34% | 0 | - |
J Manning | 8 | 13% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
O Marigold | 84 | 19% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
P Martinson | 88 | 18% | 7 | 14% | 0 | - |
C Masters | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Maund | 10 | 30% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R McCoy | 11 | 27% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D McCreery | 19 | 32% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C McDonagh | 66 | 21% | 5 | 60% | 0 | - |
K McDonald | 8 | 75% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A McGlone | 26 | 54% | 13 | 46% | 15 | 27% |
N McGurk | 0 | - | 53 | 15% | 0 | - |
I McHugh | 0 | - | 33 | 42% | 0 | - |
L McKay | 2 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Megginson | 58 | 19% | 15 | 13% | 0 | - |
R Merrett | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 37 | 41% |
P Mileham | 19 | 21% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
H Miles | 55 | 27% | 19 | 32% | 0 | - |
M Milliken | 6 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Moore | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 22 | 14% |
J Moore | 8 | 0% | 15 | 13% | 0 | - |
F Morgan | 48 | 27% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
J Morrison | 25 | 24% | 9 | 44% | 0 | - |
J Moss | 4 | 0% | 0 | - | 30 | 27% |
E Moulton | 57 | 40% | 9 | 67% | 0 | - |
C Mulloy | 7 | 14% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Murray | 24 | 29% | 7 | 14% | 0 | - |
J Murray | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 7 | 14% |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
R Naylor | 51 | 25% | 27 | 37% | 0 | - |
H Nicholls | 59 | 32% | 3 | 0% | 0 | - |
D Nicholson | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Nilsson | 73 | 15% | 24 | 46% | 0 | - |
R Norman | 9 | 56% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Normington | 6 | 50% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
M Nunn | 4 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
L Nurser | 2 | 50% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Decision Maker | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
L O'Brien | 24 | 33% | 6 | 50% | 0 | - |
H O'Connor | 25 | 24% | 12 | 42% | 0 | - |
A O'Doherty | 61 | 13% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
M Ollerenshaw | 72 | 21% | 20 | 25% | 0 | - |
E Ord | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 2 | 50% |
H Orr | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 6 | 50% |
A Owen | 22 | 32% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
L Page | 44 | 18% | 18 | 6% | 0 | - |
N Palmer | 11 | 55% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Pannell | 51 | 22% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Parker | 28 | 61% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
R Parker | 55 | 27% | 5 | 60% | 0 | - |
A Parkin | 45 | 13% | 8 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Parsons | 35 | 17% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
A Partington | 14 | 43% | 2 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Pattison | 35 | 26% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
S Pearce | 1 | 0% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Peerless | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 9 | 22% |
L Perkins | 5 | 80% | 0 | - | 19 | 21% |
R Perrins | 0 | - | 0 | - | 9 | 78% |
A Phillips | 3 | 0% | 0 | - | 33 | 24% |
B Phillips | 47 | 21% | 10 | 10% | 0 | - |
M Philpott | 21 | 38% | 8 | 50% | 0 | - |
E Pickernell | 0 | - | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
A Pinto | 2 | 0% | 8 | 25% | 0 | - |
C Pipe | 8 | 13% | 49 | 31% | 0 | - |
R Pipkin | 36 | 25% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
E Pleasant | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 32 | 34% |
B Plenty | 67 | 39% | 12 | 42% | 0 | - |
S Poole | 8 | 25% | 50 | 12% | 0 | - |
N Pope | 8 | 13% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
H Porter | 2 | 50% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Powis | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Prail | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 8 | 0% |
N Praine | 59 | 27% | 14 | 21% | 0 | - |
D Prentis | 10 | 60% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
C Preston | 2 | 0% | 7 | 43% | 16 | 19% |
A Price | 100 | 23% | 11 | 9% | 0 | - |
J Price | 23 | 39% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
I Radcliffe | 28 | 46% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
C Rafferty | 105 | 31% | 9 | 56% | 0 | - |
F Rafiq | 62 | 31% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
E Randle | 3 | 0% | 63 | 44% | 0 | - |
S Rawle | 1 | 0% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
Z Raygen | 27 | 48% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Redford | 76 | 24% | 25 | 40% | 0 | - |
D Reed | 29 | 38% | 10 | 30% | 0 | - |
J Reid | 36 | 22% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
L Renaudon | 6 | 33% | 0 | - | 23 | 43% |
S Rennie | 60 | 33% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
M Rivett | 2 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
G Robbie | 27 | 22% | 7 | 57% | 13 | 31% |
K Robbie | 73 | 26% | 9 | 44% | 0 | - |
G Roberts | 13 | 23% | 49 | 45% | 0 | - |
M Robins | 4 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
N Robinson | 46 | 24% | 14 | 43% | 0 | - |
B Rogers | 0 | - | 0 | - | 28 | 29% |
J Rogers | 47 | 17% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
G Rollings | 9 | 22% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Rose | 30 | 23% | 7 | 57% | 0 | - |
D Rose | 6 | 50% | 3 | 67% | 0 | - |
P Rose | 6 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Russell | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 20 | 35% |
M Russell | 57 | 18% | 19 | 16% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
R Sabu | 44 | 27% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
J Sargent | 25 | 24% | 10 | 20% | 0 | - |
R Satheesan | 5 | 20% | 0 | - | 52 | 19% |
K Savage | 71 | 30% | 24 | 46% | 0 | - |
M Savage | 4 | 0% | 3 | 67% | 58 | 7% |
K Saward | 0 | - | 0 | - | 34 | 0% |
A Scott | 36 | 3% | 16 | 13% | 0 | - |
M Scriven | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
C Searson | 6 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Seaton | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Seddon | 0 | - | 39 | 23% | 0 | - |
P Sedgwick | 4 | 25% | 35 | 34% | 0 | - |
H Senior*
|
4 | 50% | 44 | 34% | 0 | - |
C Shearing | 82 | 33% | 13 | 54% | 0 | - |
C Sherratt | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 5 | 20% |
T Shields | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 35 | 23% |
M Shrigley | 7 | 14% | 2 | 50% | 0 | - |
R Shrimplin | 38 | 29% | 24 | 54% | 0 | - |
G Sibley* | 2 | 50% | 33 | 30% | 0 | - |
L Simpson | 63 | 25% | 18 | 39% | 0 | - |
V Simpson | 43 | 33% | 8 | 25% | 0 | - |
B Sims | 10 | 60% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Smith | 39 | 31% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
D Smith | 56 | 41% | 7 | 71% | 0 | - |
H Smith | 76 | 26% | 7 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Smith | 40 | 38% | 7 | 29% | 0 | - |
J Somers | 12 | 17% | 53 | 32% | 0 | - |
A Spataru* | 1 | 0% | 12 | 17% | 0 | - |
D Spencer | 23 | 17% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Spencer-Peet | 53 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Staddon | 12 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Steen | 10 | 20% | 0 | - | 27 | 22% |
H Stephens | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
K Stephens | 63 | 25% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Stone | 1 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Storey | 20 | 25% | 5 | 40% | 0 | - |
P Sturgess | 10 | 30% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
A Sutton | 41 | 12% | 10 | 30% | 0 | - |
G Sylvester | 22 | 14% | 8 | 63% | 0 | - |
E Symmons | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Symmons | 55 | 29% | 9 | 22% | 0 | - |
G Symons | 0 | - | 0 | - | 5 | 60% |
D Szymanski | 33 | 12% | 6 | 33% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
Karen Taylor | 19 | 11% | 3 | 33% | 9 | 22% |
Kenneth Taylor | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
N Teasdale | 26 | 23% | 8 | 63% | 0 | - |
B Thandi | 69 | 43% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
G Thomas | 7 | 43% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
M Thomas | 15 | 40% | 41 | 44% | 0 | - |
N Thomas | 0 | - | 0 | - | 4 | 25% |
R Thomas | 0 | - | 28 | 32% | 0 | - |
F Thompson | 4 | 75% | 0 | - | 36 | 25% |
P Thompson | 60 | 32% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
C Tivey | 4 | 0% | 22 | 32% | 0 | - |
K Townend | 15 | 7% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
D Troy | 13 | 23% | 28 | 21% | 0 | - |
A Tucker | 57 | 25% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
J Tweddle | 15 | 7% | 4 | 25% | 6 | 17% |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
G Underwood | 8 | 50% | 1 | 100% | 0 | - |
N Unwin* | 0 | - | 34 | 47% | 0 | - |
A Veevers | 49 | 45% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Vyse | 4 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Alexander Walker | 0 | - | 0 | - | 8 | 25% |
Andrew Walker | 0 | - | 0 | - | 23 | 26% |
R Walker | 38 | 18% | 32 | 34% | 0 | - |
D Wallis | 8 | 38% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
R Walmsley | 5 | 60% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
S Warder | 2 | 50% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Ware | 6 | 67% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Samuel Watson | 78 | 32% | 2 | 100% | 0 | - |
Siobhan Watson | 15 | 27% | 3 | 33% | 14 | 29% |
B Webb | 55 | 40% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
M Webb* | 0 | - | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
J Wellstead | 12 | 0% | 6 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Westbrook | 9 | 0% | 33 | 39% | 0 | - |
J Whalley | 0 | - | 13 | 46% | 19 | 16% |
A Wharton | 0 | - | 0 | - | 18 | 6% |
P Whelan | 19 | 42% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J White | 19 | 21% | 17 | 47% | 0 | - |
P White | 69 | 23% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
M Whitehead | 2 | 100% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
J Wilde | 5 | 40% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
B Wilders | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Wildgoose | 1 | 0% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
D Wildsmith | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
F Wilkinson | 88 | 28% | 4 | 50% | 0 | - |
H Wilkinson | 27 | 26% | 7 | 43% | 0 | - |
S Wilkinson | 26 | 31% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
K Williams | 27 | 22% | 12 | 42% | 0 | - |
J Williamson | 31 | 16% | 5 | 20% | 0 | - |
Inspector/ Appeal Planning Officer* | s78 planning appeals | Householder appeals | Enforcement appeals | |||
no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | no. decided 2022/23 | % allowed 2022/23 | |
S Willis | 28 | 39% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
P Willmer | 0 | - | 46 | 35% | 0 | - |
P Willows | 1 | 0% | 0 | - | 18 | 39% |
D Wilson | 17 | 6% | 4 | 25% | 0 | - |
J Wilson | 5 | 0% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
L Wilson | 61 | 25% | 15 | 67% | 0 | - |
S Wilson* | 4 | 0% | 26 | 27% | 0 | - |
K Winnard | 0 | - | 25 | 44% | 0 | - |
S Witherley* | 15 | 60% | 18 | 17% | 0 | - |
S Wood | 20 | 30% | 19 | 26% | 0 | - |
M Woodward | 20 | 30% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
O Woodwards | 24 | 50% | 1 | 0% | 0 | - |
J Woolcock | 4 | 25% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
M Worden | 3 | 33% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
E Worley | 54 | 43% | 13 | 38% | 0 | - |
E Worthington | 12 | 17% | 5 | 0% | 0 | - |
G Wraight | 13 | 31% | 10 | 30% | 9 | 22% |
A Wright | 0 | - | 10 | 40% | 0 | - |
Y Wright | 2 | 0% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
G Wyatt | 18 | 22% | 3 | 33% | 0 | - |
D Wyborn | 36 | 39% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
D Young | 22 | 73% | 0 | - | 0 | - |
* Appeal Planning Officers inform a more senior Inspector's decision. Please note Appeal Finder records the Inspector as the decision maker, whereas the PINS table above records members of staff. This results in inconsistencies between the figures on the above PINS table and if you select by Inspector on Appeal Finder.
Source: PINS annual statistics for the year, table 5.2; Please see the important notes at the end of table when interpreting the data.
Test our service entirely free for a month. There's absolutely no obligation and there's no payment details required. We're sure you'll be pleasantly surprised, so just complete our Free Trial request form today.
Terms & Conditions Cookies Policy Privacy Notice Follow on LinkedIn