Winning appeals with good evidence on affordable housing
We have all heard of appeals where the affordable housing contribution has tipped the scales in favour of the development, but in practice how do you make a convincing case? There are three key sources of evidence:
- The Local Plan's affordable housing target, against which you can compare the following;
- Evidence of affordable housing delivery; and
- Evidence of worsening affordable housing need.
A comparison between these three quickly exposes any local problems and provides firm evidence you can put before a Planning Inspector.
1. The Local Plan affordable housing target
If the Local Plan's specific target for affordable homes cannot be found in a specific policy, try searching the Plan's explanatory text, the Plan's aims & objectives, and its monitoring sections.
The target for the number of affordable dwellings is commonly expressed as a percentage of the whole housing requirement (eg. 40% of 15,000 over the plan period of 15 years). You can easily convert this to an equivalent annual figure (in our example, the annual figure would be 40% of 1,000pa, or 400 affordable units per annum). This can then be compared with MHCLG's official statistics on housing delivery.
2. Affordable housing delivery
Government data shows whether affordable housing needs are actually being met, for each and every local planning authority. An excellent and automatic calculation of all the affordable housing components for individual LPAs is available in MHCLG's Table 1011 last updated on 20 Nov 2025. Just select the LPA name 2024/25 in row 6 for a handy, bespoke table.
More detail is available in MHCLG's detailed statistics on affordable housing delivery and starts (last updated November 2025 with 2024/25 figures). Particularly useful are:
- Table 1008S provides the total number of starts on site, by local authority;
- Table 1008C provides the total number of completions, by local authority;
- For tenure breakdown see Tables 1006 (social rent), 1006a (affordable rent), 1007a (intermediate rent), 1007b (shared ownership) and 1007c (affordable home ownership).
Comparing HMCLG's official figures with the LPA's target for affordable housing delivery will expose just how much of a shortfall exists, providing firm evidence to which a planning Inspector must have regard.
3. Evidence of affordable housing needs
MHCLG's statistics also allow us to identify if the affordable housing need has changed since the Local Plan was adopted. The two main sources of evidence are:
- a. Housing waiting lists for social rented or affordable housing
- b. The local affordability ratio, the key measure of how unaffordable market housing is.
3a. Waiting lists for affordable housing
Long waiting lists for affordable housing are common, but it can be difficult to find these figures on local authority websites. Instead evidence on housing need to support your planning appeal case is quickly and simply found in MHCLG's Table 600: numbers of households on local authorities' housing waiting lists, by district (last updated 20 Nov 2025). This usefully shows change over time.
Local authorities periodically "purge" their housing waiting lists by asking housing associations/ Registered Providers to get applicants to re-apply. This is undoubtably necessary to remove people who have moved away or whose circumstances have changed. It does however lead to years when waiting lists suddenly drop, often by thousands of people. Be aware that the accuracy of a housing waiting list can be a matter of contention, although it will be a brave local authority to argue at an appeal that its own data sources on housing need are suspect.
3b. The local affordability ratio
National Planning Practice Guidance sets out in the 'Standard Method' the Government's choice of statistics for measuring housing pressure. It is of course the local affordability ratio of median house prices to median workplace based earnings.
Set out in table 5c in the Office of National Statistics tables, this is used to identify how unaffordable housing is locally. For example, a ratio of 10.64 (Trafford, Greater Manchester) means the median house price is over 10 times median salaries. Contrast with Hartlepool where the ratio is 4.12, or Windsor & Maidenhead where the ratio is 14.15, and you get the picture.
The local affordability ratio is for the year ending September and is published the following March. It can be useful for showing how unaffordable a LPA is compared to its neighbours, or the trend over time.
Weight given to affordable housing in appeals
NPPF paragraph 8 requires that planning should, “support strong, vibrant and healthy communities, by ensuring that a sufficient number and range of homes can be provided”. Clearly affordable housing within a scheme helps deliver this objective and it is acknowledged to be a priority both for central Government and for Local Planning Authorities. However there is little guidance on how much weight a decision maker should give to affordable housing in making their balanced planning judgment. This is where firm statistics can make a significant difference. If there is good evidence of a specific shortfall of affordable housing, an appeal Inspector is much more likely to give more weight to the benefits of the development in helping to meet this need.
For example, appeal 3271340 for up to 36 dwellings at Maplewell Road, Woodhouse Eaves, was refused by Charnwood Borough Council. In his appeal decision, the Inspector gave “significant weight to the provision of affordable housing here, with its associated social benefits”. It's much easier for an Inspector to give greater weight if the appellant has provided firm evidence in their appeal Statement of Case.
To find appeals that can help strengthen your appeal Statement of Case see our Home page.
You may also be interested in the Insider's Guide to the Housing Delivery Test here and in a handy table of HDT results by LPA over time here. Other tools which can help you make the case for housing development are here.
